Re: CVS
- From: Max Watson <redline pdq net>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: CVS
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 08:17:14 -0500
At 12:57 AM 4/8/98 -0500, vizzie@airmail.net wrote:
>>>>>> "RPD" == Roland Pleasant Dunkerley <javaman@millennial.org> writes:
>
> RPD> What's slp? sounds exactly like what I've neen advocating for
> RPD> years (and slamming both redhat and debian for not doing, make
> RPD> the package a .zip file with the first file a .tar containing
> RPD> the installable image, put the other packaging control files
> RPD> into the .zip as separate files, prehaps including a fast copy
> RPD> of the toc of the tar, a signature for the tar, etc. People
> RPD> who don't care about your package system can still use the file
> RPD> just like a plain old .tar.gz, but it has all this other useful
> RPD> information...
>
>*grin* But that's -exactly- what a Debian package looks like. Well,
>almost. It's actually an "ar" archive of 2 .tar.gz files,
>control.tar.gz (the package information files) and data.tar.gz (the
>actual files in the package). Grab one, run "ar x" on it, and untar
>the resulting files, you'll see :) The point is, though, that a .deb
>can be unpacked very easily with only standard UNIX tools and no real
>contortions.
Well, .slp is Stampede's Package format. It is a gz or bz2 compressed tar
file, that contains extra data at the end for dependencies, (optional)
install/setup script, etc. To unpack a .slp on a non stampede system simply
tar -xzvof package.slp or tar -xIzvof package.slp. Very simple, and very
nice. This is not to start a packaging war here, .slp has different (albiet
similar) goals than .rpm or .deb. Sort of like how GNOME has different
goals than KDE. :) Info on .slp is available at
http://www.stampede.org/developer.html
M.Watson <redline@pdq.net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]