Re: Experimental repositories on git.gnome.org

[Sandy Armstrong <sanfordarmstrong gmail com>]

On 02/18/2009 12:49 PM, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> On 02/18/2009 09:12 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 06:57 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> > > On 01/14/2009 04:10 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > > A few repositories are known broken, including:
> > > <snip>
> > > >     tomboy
> > > Is it worth reporting that the Tomboy repository is still broken? Not
> > > sure if a new migration has been run recently, so just checking.  I
> > > believe it's a simple matter of not importing an ancient tag from CVS
> > > named "HEAD".
> > I reimported it just now, looks better?
>
> Well, the HEAD tag is gone now and I can use gitk, which rocks, but
> there are now some new problems:
>
> 1) Some missing files: autogen.sh, tomboy.spec.in, help/omf.make,
> help/tomboy.omf.in, help/C/legal.xml, help/C/figures/tomboy-tools.png,
> help/es/figures/tomboy-tools.png.  There are also missing .cvsignore
> files, but that is of course OK.  I used meld to do the comparison, btw.
>
> 2) I noticed there are some duplicate tags, like TOMBOY_0_12_2 (from svn
> r2263) and TOMBOY_0_12_2_svn2264 (from svn r2264).  I am guessing that
> this is the result of retagging?  If so, then I think only the latest
> one should be kept.  If there is some reason to keep both, then the
> latest one should keep the TOMBOY_0_12_2 name, and the earlier attemps
> should get the "_svnXXXX" suffix.

Any update on these issues? The first is a blocker for us, and the 
second is fairly serious as well.

Please let me know if I should just sit tight for awhile, or if there's 
some other way you'd prefer me to report these issues.  Don't want to be 
a bother. :-)

Thanks,
Sandy