Re: Experimental repositories on

On 02/18/2009 12:49 PM, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On 02/18/2009 09:12 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 06:57 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On 01/14/2009 04:10 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
A few repositories are known broken, including:

Is it worth reporting that the Tomboy repository is still broken? Not
sure if a new migration has been run recently, so just checking.  I
believe it's a simple matter of not importing an ancient tag from CVS
named "HEAD".
I reimported it just now, looks better?

Well, the HEAD tag is gone now and I can use gitk, which rocks, but
there are now some new problems:

1) Some missing files:,, help/omf.make,
help/, help/C/legal.xml, help/C/figures/tomboy-tools.png,
help/es/figures/tomboy-tools.png.  There are also missing .cvsignore
files, but that is of course OK.  I used meld to do the comparison, btw.

2) I noticed there are some duplicate tags, like TOMBOY_0_12_2 (from svn
r2263) and TOMBOY_0_12_2_svn2264 (from svn r2264).  I am guessing that
this is the result of retagging?  If so, then I think only the latest
one should be kept.  If there is some reason to keep both, then the
latest one should keep the TOMBOY_0_12_2 name, and the earlier attemps
should get the "_svnXXXX" suffix.

Any update on these issues? The first is a blocker for us, and the second is fairly serious as well.

Please let me know if I should just sit tight for awhile, or if there's some other way you'd prefer me to report these issues. Don't want to be a bother. :-)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]