Re: Experimental repositories on git.gnome.org

[Sandy Armstrong <sanfordarmstrong gmail com>]

On 02/18/2009 09:12 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 06:57 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> > On 01/14/2009 04:10 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > A few repositories are known broken, including:
> > <snip>
> > >    tomboy
> > Is it worth reporting that the Tomboy repository is still broken? Not
> > sure if a new migration has been run recently, so just checking.  I
> > believe it's a simple matter of not importing an ancient tag from CVS
> > named "HEAD".
>
> I reimported it just now, looks better?

Well, the HEAD tag is gone now and I can use gitk, which rocks, but 
there are now some new problems:

1) Some missing files: autogen.sh, tomboy.spec.in, help/omf.make, 
help/tomboy.omf.in, help/C/legal.xml, help/C/figures/tomboy-tools.png, 
help/es/figures/tomboy-tools.png.  There are also missing .cvsignore 
files, but that is of course OK.  I used meld to do the comparison, btw.

2) I noticed there are some duplicate tags, like TOMBOY_0_12_2 (from svn 
r2263) and TOMBOY_0_12_2_svn2264 (from svn r2264).  I am guessing that 
this is the result of retagging?  If so, then I think only the latest 
one should be kept.  If there is some reason to keep both, then the 
latest one should keep the TOMBOY_0_12_2 name, and the earlier attemps 
should get the "_svnXXXX" suffix.

Thanks for the awesome work,
Sandy