Re: Label now master LDAP server
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
- Cc: gnome-infrastructure gnome org
- Subject: Re: Label now master LDAP server
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:08:41 -0500
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 11:47 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:18:52PM +0000, Ross Golder wrote:
> > master, so I made label the master instead of button, and set up
> > replication from label to socket. I transferred the live configuration
> > and data from button to label, tested it, updated the 'ldap-back'
>
> Not having ldap on button improved the performance of Bugzilla
> significantly. So, thanks. :)
That doesn't make sense to me ... performance should be about the
same whether LDAP is running remotely on label or remotely on button.
Label is a more powerful machine, but not significantly more so.
And why would bugzilla be doing more than a very few lookups against
LDAP? (Especially if we are running nscd, which we probably should be.)
We simply need to get the other machines upgraded ... migrating
everything to box and label because they are RHEL4 isn't sustainable.
- Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]