Re: Weird status for several modules and releases



Le mardi 21 avril 2009 à 10:14 +0200, Jorge González a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 13:58, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
> >
> >>  and I also noticed few new
> >> untranslated and fuzzy strings for old releases (both at UI and
> >> manuals). I tried to update those but it says everything is up to date,
> >> so I guess is a problem with DL/intltool.
> >
> > Please point to real examples if you want me to check for problems.
> These should be at 100%, at least they were in SVN:
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gok/gnome-2-22/po/es
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gok/gnome-2-22/po/es

I extracted gok 2.22 branch from SVN and from git, compared the po files
after an intltool-update, and found out where the differences were:

diff -u gok-svn/gnome-2-22/gok.desktop.in gok/gok.desktop.in 
--- gok-svn/gnome-2-22/gok.desktop.in	2009-04-21 14:43:26.000000000
+0200
+++ gok/gok.desktop.in	2009-04-21 14:45:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 [Desktop Entry]
 Encoding=UTF-8
 _Name=On-Screen Keyboard
-_Comment=Type and navigate applications using alternative input devices
+_Comment=Navigate applications and type using alternative input devices
 Exec=gok
 Terminal=false
 Type=Application


> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-24/help/es
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-22/help/es
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-20/help/es
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-18/help/es
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-user-docs/gnome-2-22/accessibility-guide/es
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/eog/gnome-2-18/po/es

eog.glade is even not in the same directory in svn or git gnome-2-18
branches. But there is an origin/gnome-2-18_svn3671 branch which might
explain some import problem...

> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-volume-manager/gnome-2-18/po/es
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-terminal/gnome-2-20/help/es
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/sound-juicer/gnome-2-20/po/es
> 

I didn't explore all problematic modules above, but this shows that the
git migration seems not entirely trustable :-(

As translator, I'd suggest not to touch these old branches, and let the
sysadmin team resolve these issues first (hence cc'ed
gnome-infrastructure).

Cheers,

Claude



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]