Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'
- From: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- To: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.HEAD'
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:22:21 +0200
Le mer 23 jui 2008 11:55:49 CEST, Thomas Wood <thos gnome org> a écrit:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu:
> Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <thos gnome org> a écrit:
[...]
> The problem is that strings from gnome-backgrounds didn't change for
> long, and are freezed from GNOME 2.12 on!
> If you want to change/add strings, you'll have to branch
> gnome-backgrounds first (probably a gnome-2-22 branch).
>
Maybe there's no need for branching (this time). GNOME 2.22.3 was
already released, so this "string freeze break" won't affect anyone. It
surely would be unnacceptable if the strings were added before we
released GNOME 2.22.3. IIRC, gnome-user-docs don't branch because it's
updated only after GNOME 2.xx.3 is released.
Exactly, I wasn't planning on doing any concurrent development, so I
didn't see any need to branch. I specifically timed my changes so they
where after the last stable release of 2.22.
We are currently in a period where there are no string freezes in place
(except perhaps for stable branches, where they exist). I suggest that
your string freeze notification script is slightly broken for the case
that a module does not make a stable branch!
Regards,
Thomas
Please read
http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/HandlingStringFreezes
Read especially the section "What happens if I break the string freeze
without approval?" :-)
More seriously, once a module's trunk is stringfreezed, only the branch
operation can "defreeze" it. That's the policy we try to enforce for
years now.
Claude
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]