Re: Rethinking "Supported language"



> Frankly, I hadn't been convinced by any of the proposals until now. The
> 80%/50% rules are not perfect, but unless we have some serious method to
> be more accurate, like Danilo proposed in his D-L HACKING file, I don't
> see any reason to change it now.

 +1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]