Re: GNOME 2.20 stats
- From: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.20 stats
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:14:17 +0200
Le mardi 10 avril 2007 �7:01 +0200, Marcel Telka a �it :
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> > 2007/4/9, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>:
> > >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >What about generating 2.20 stats, now that 2.18.1 is about to be
> > >released and 2.19.1 is approaching?
> >
> >
> > I think that sounds like a good idea
> >
> > Should we keep 2.14 stats?
> >
> >
> > We do off course not use them for anything anymore, but they might be nice
> > to keep so that we can see how our translation effort have developed. So I
>
> But this is not obvious from the status page, AFAIK. A beginner could be
> confused and start to translate gnome 2.14 stuff...
>
> I am voting (if I could) for gnome 2.14 removal.
I just added 2.20 release. For now, I'm letting 2.14, but I added a
short description with each release, see http://l10n.gnome.org/releases/
If Danilo is reading, please tell me how to change the order of items on
this page.
I kept the branches for:
<module id="glib" branch="glib-2-12"/>
<module id="gtk+" branch="gtk-2-10"/>
<module id="ekiga" branch="gnome-2-14"/>
Just tell me if you know something about them.
Claude
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]