Re: GNOME 2.20 stats

["Kenneth Nielsen" <k nielsen81 gmail com>]

2007/4/10, Marcel Telka <marcel telka sk>:

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> 2007/4/9, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >What about generating 2.20 stats, now that 2.18.1 is about to be
> >released and 2.19.1 is approaching?
>
>
> I think that sounds like a good idea
>
> Should we keep 2.14 stats?
>
>
> We do off course not use them for anything anymore, but they might be nice
> to keep so that we can see how our translation effort have developed. So I

But this is not obvious from the status page, AFAIK. A beginner could be
confused and start to translate gnome 2.14 stuff...

I am voting (if I could) for gnome 2.14 removal.

It's not really that important to me. It was just to preserve the stats, so it would be fine by me, if instead we just grabbed the stats when the old version were removed and added them to a history page or something, or just forget the whole thing. It is a good thing to have the status page as nice and clean as possible. But maybe then it should be given some more thought then, maybe some sort of a standard could be made so that we just always only keep 3 version on the statuspage or something.
\TLE