Re: What encoding to use for the translations

[Karl Eichwalder <keichwa gmx net>]

Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> writes:

> Avoiding the conversion is probably faster and saves memory anyhow,
> though.

Sure.  It's the best to do the conversion at installation time (using
msgconv, hopefully to be released soon); advantages:

    . The translator can use the encoding that fits best for her.

    . Good performance while running the program.

-- 
ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home):              |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/                                  |      ,__o
Free Translation Project:                                |    _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/             |   (*)/'(*)