Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- Cc: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome org>, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>, Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>, Hacking Gnomes <gnome-hackers gnome org>, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- Subject: Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 00:49:49 -0400
Hello,
> Most of my experiences have been using baz at work on my own coding
> projects and talking with arch people about various issues I've
> encountered. I hope this is a balanced observation on arch. My two
> cents.
I very much enjoyed your description of some of the internals of arch
and bazar. I only thought that one was an interface on top of the other,
but it seems from your description that it is a different implementation
of the same format/protocol.
I would like to encourage everyone to read your post (in fact, if you
could put those points on the Wiki, it would be great if people want to
fix/correct those points).
If anything, your list made me *more* worried though.
"is changing rapidly" is not something I want to hear in the context of
my source code control system. And the potential incompatibilities
between tla/baz are also worth considering.
Am sure we will have an interesting discussion at guadec.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]