Re: Subversion migration.

[Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>]

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:06:15PM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>     KDE moved to Subversion, news on Slashdot.

If we moved to Arch, I bet we would make even bigger news on slashdot ;)
Any press is good press! :-)

>     Which reminded me that a year ago we had a discussion on migration
> from CVS to Subversion on this mailing list, but nothing came out of it.
> I know that it was discussed at the Boston Gnome Summit.
> 
>     My impression from the discussion at the Boston Gnome Summit is that
> some people want to try out some experimental source code control
> projects.  

I think most of us in the 'arch' camp really don't have any big
objection to subversion.  It allows us to use the same thing we've
been doing so far while using 'arch' would require us to think about 
how we do development today.  If we're bored we could have that 
conversation!

So as much as I would love us to use Arch it might not be pragmatic.

(note: there is a arch mirror of some of GNOME modules in cvs already)
sri