Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome org>
- Cc: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>, Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>, Hacking Gnomes <gnome-hackers gnome org>, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- Subject: Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:59:40 -0400
Hello,
> > The Mono repository holds 1.6 gigabytes of data.
>
> I don't have access to the server that has all Ubuntu archives but as
> you can guess, if Ubuntu imports all packages it ships will be much more
> bigger than 1.6GB...
Is this checking in a tarball, or checking in the uncompressed tarball
and managing the resulting binary?
Does this check every vendor release into its own branch?
> Well, I know that Debian and some GNOME products are already using Arch.
> Ubuntu is finishing the deployment to start using it a lot and thus any
> derivative will use it also (like KUbuntu and Guadalinex)
>
> About others using Arch:
A very interesting list, but it does not seem to have any large projects
with hundreds of developers.
> > > Arch has also developers working on it at full time.
> >
> > Lets get numbers: how many.
> >
> > Subversion has 8 full time employees that have been working full time
> > since 2000, and they are employed by Collab.NET that specializes on
> > this.
>
> I don't have those details, sorry.
I think it is a very important feature if we are talking about moving
something as delicate as GNOME to use a new source code control system.
This is not a trivial discussion and not one that can be easily reworked
later on.
Miguel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]