Re: more gnome 2 proposal

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:

> Chema Celorio <chema ximian com> writes: 
> > However a bigger library is indeed easier to build (from my experience)
> > so we need to find a way to fix this. The scenario that itp brought up
> > is a _daily_ royal pain for hackers and to-be-hackers. 
> 
> My proposal is that we generalize Eazel's cvs-checkout-and-build
> script, and have Tinderbox checking it for function at all times. This
> gives us a canonical location to keep track of which branches,
> etc. are supposed to be used, also. So to build GNOME you'd just grab
> this script out of CVS run it, it would do cvs updates as appropriate
> and so on.
> 
> Suggest writing the script in a real language not /bin/sh so that it's
> maintainable and can do things like read config files.

Well, I'm pretty happy with George's build scripts and using them since
the early days of my gnome-libs HEAD hacking. Maybe we should put them
into CVS or something.

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers