Re: stupid gconf patch

[Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>]

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 04:16:59PM -0800, Darin Adler wrote:
> on 12/11/00 4:09 PM, Havoc Pennington at hp redhat com wrote:
> 
> > Is there any problem being caused by using gnome-xml/tree.h, etc.?
> > It makes me nervous to include names like "tree.h", "parse.h" -
> > serious lack of namespacing there.
> 
> Let me second this question/comment. Under the (perhaps false) impression
> that Daniel had resolved this issue, I changed all the Nautilus includes to
> use the gnome-xml/ prefix. I seem to recall a 1.X -> 2.X web page that
> strongly implied (and maybe said outright) that you can use the prefix with
> 1.X now.

  Sure, but not this prefix :-(

 http://xmlsoft.org/upgrade.html

-------------
1.similar include naming, one should use #include<libxml/...> in both cases. 
-------------

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard w3 org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
 http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | http://rpmfind.net/

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers