Re: stupid gconf patch
- From: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>
- Cc: <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: stupid gconf patch
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:16:59 -0800
on 12/11/00 4:09 PM, Havoc Pennington at hp redhat com wrote:
> Is there any problem being caused by using gnome-xml/tree.h, etc.?
> It makes me nervous to include names like "tree.h", "parse.h" -
> serious lack of namespacing there.
Let me second this question/comment. Under the (perhaps false) impression
that Daniel had resolved this issue, I changed all the Nautilus includes to
use the gnome-xml/ prefix. I seem to recall a 1.X -> 2.X web page that
strongly implied (and maybe said outright) that you can use the prefix with
1.X now.
-- Darin
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]