Re: stupid gconf patch

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Darin Adler <darin eazel com> writes:

> on 12/11/00 4:09 PM, Havoc Pennington at hp redhat com wrote:
> 
> > Is there any problem being caused by using gnome-xml/tree.h, etc.?
> > It makes me nervous to include names like "tree.h", "parse.h" -
> > serious lack of namespacing there.
> 
> Let me second this question/comment. Under the (perhaps false) impression
> that Daniel had resolved this issue, I changed all the Nautilus includes to
> use the gnome-xml/ prefix. I seem to recall a 1.X -> 2.X web page that
> strongly implied (and maybe said outright) that you can use the prefix with
> 1.X now.

Hmm, I remember it the other way around (#include <libxml/...>) and that's also
what the docu says:

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers