Re: [gnome-db] Gnome-db libraries
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Vivien Malerba <vmalerba gmail com>
- Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>, gnome-db list <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] Gnome-db libraries
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:08:00 +0100
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 22:08 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:46 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:32 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 13:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > > Can we also have some more regular tarball releases please, so it's
> > > > > easier for the C++ bindings to be buildable with specific releases.
> > > >
> > > > By the way, I am happy to do these at random intervals, if that's OK. I
> > > > will probably leave the announcements to someone else.
> > > >
> > > if you fill in the NEWS file and then do the tarball, I can do the
> > > announcement (and the SVN tagging if you haven't) whenever you tell me
> > > to do so.
> > I have now released the 2.99.3 tarballs for libgda and libgnomedb, and
> > created the svn tags.
> Did you make an announcement, copy the tarballs, etc because if you
> haven't, then I'd like to include my latest commits to the new release
> as it changes quite a few thing specially in libgnomedb.
No, I haven't announced it, but there's no problem with doing another
release soon, and no reason to wait too long before doing releases. Is
anything else on the way?
> > I have committed lots of patches from bugzilla, and generally cleaned up
> > the list of bugs. The libgda and libgnomedb bugzilla reports have been
> > ignored for a long time, and we need to do a better job of this.
> Yes, aggreed...
murrayc murrayc com
] [Thread Prev