Re: [gnome-db] future of bonobo as libgnomedb requirement

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:00 +0100, Gour wrote:
> Rodrigo Moya (rodrigo gnome-db org) wrote:
> 
> > I don't see the point in adding those widgets, which means adding 
> > mostly all of libgda, to GTK. Database access is a specific thing, 
> > used only by specific applications, so having it in separate libraries 
> > makes much more sense to me than adding everything to one lib.
> 
> I agree. Probably it is also more easy for devs to maintain. 
> 
> The inquiry was to know whether in providing libgda/libgnome bindings 
> for Haskell, one would 'stay' in or out of gtk, i.e. atm, gtk2hs project 
> covers about 90%, so adding more stuff into gtk would mean that writing 
> gnomedb bindings will 'push' the project to keep over 90% :-)
> 
for the time being, haskell bindings should be out of GTK, if that's
what you mean.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>