Re: [gnome-db] a late gASQL
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Malerba_Vivien stna dgac fr
- Cc: GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] a late gASQL
- Date: 17 Oct 2001 18:55:54 +0200
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 14:20, Malerba_Vivien stna dgac fr wrote:
> le mar 16-10-2001 at 12:32 Rodrigo Moya a érit :
> > > No problem, do you plan to make other name changes?
> > >
> > which name changes did I do? (sorry, I can't remember right now :-)
>
> For example gda_field_type() became gda_field_get_gdatype(),
> gda_field_boolean() became gda_field_get_boolean_value()...
>
oh, yes, again, sorry, I didn't try to compile gASQL, but I'll do it
next time :-)
> >
> > > > since it was a quick release we did Carlos and I the
> > > > other evening to fix the problems that were having the people trying to
> > > > do the RPMs (which don't seem to be fixed, BTW).
> > >
> > > For 0.2.91, I had removed the default provider to build as I was
> > > preparing a new version for gASQL.
> > >
> > yes, that was the problem. This is fixed in 0.2.92, but we found other
> > problems, related to RPM variables.
> >
> > > >
> > > > This makes me ask if there's somebody on the list with RPM knowledge who
> > > > could try the current spec files and fix them? Once they're fixed, we've
> > > > got volunteers to make the RPMs for every version we release, so it
> > > > would be a great help for us :-)
> > >
> > > So far, I've made RPMS but I removed all the docs since there are some
> > > problems with inexistant .omf files. I'll test the specs this week if
> > > you want.
> > >
> > hmm, can you send the output to see where it's failing? The .omf files
> > are supposed to be in the latest versions.
>
> I just downloaded the 0.2.92 tarball, I'm on a Mandrake 7.1 with Ximian
> Gnome installed. Here are the results:
> * there aren't any .omf files in the tarball.
>
ok, I'll look at it
> * from the configure log, I don't have libxslt installed, and also no
> gtkdoc-mkdb. Do you know if it is what is missing? (BTW which RPMS
> do you have for these packages?)
>
I use debian:
ii gtk-doc-tools 0.7.0.cvs2001100 CVS build of GTK documentation
tools
which is, as you can see, from CVS. But you don't need this version
explicitly, it should work with any recent version.
About libxslt, it's not needed, it's just optional, so it shouldn't
affect the RPM making.
cheers
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> - <rodrigo ximian com>
http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]