Re: [gnome-db] a late gASQL

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 09:19, Malerba_Vivien stna dgac fr wrote:
> le mar 16-10-2001 at 02:47 Rodrigo Moya a ?rit :
> > On Mon, 2001-10-15 at 14:32, Malerba_Vivien stna dgac fr wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > I've just put the version 0.6-0.2.92 in the ftp area to work with
> > > the latest version of Gnome-DB/Libgda. Not many new things:
> > > - a patch from Waldemar Furowski to make it compile under Debian and to
> > >   cope with the name changes in 0.2.92
> > > - a big patch from Fernando Martins for the usage of joins
> > > - some memory leaks fixes
> > > 
> > great! In fact, I should have warned you before making the release, but
> > sorry, I forgot :-) 
> 
> No problem, do you plan to make other name changes?
> 
which name changes did I do? (sorry, I can't remember right now :-)

> > since it was a quick release we did Carlos and I the
> > other evening to fix the problems that were having the people trying to
> > do the RPMs (which don't seem to be fixed, BTW).
> 
> For 0.2.91, I had removed the default provider to build as I was
> preparing a new version for gASQL.
> 
yes, that was the problem. This is fixed in 0.2.92, but we found other
problems, related to RPM variables.

> > 
> > This makes me ask if there's somebody on the list with RPM knowledge who
> > could try the current spec files and fix them? Once they're fixed, we've
> > got volunteers to make the RPMs for every version we release, so it
> > would be a great help for us :-)
> 
> So far, I've made RPMS but I removed all the docs since there are some
> problems with inexistant .omf files. I'll test the specs this week if
> you want.
> 
hmm, can you send the output to see where it's failing? The .omf files
are supposed to be in the latest versions.

cheers
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> - <rodrigo ximian com>
http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/