Re: gda-sybase: Ongoing developement in cvs
- From: Holger Thon <holger gidayu max uni-duisburg de>
- To: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gda-sybase: Ongoing developement in cvs
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:06:33 +0100
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 08:31:53AM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 08:31:53 -0500 (EST)
> From: Brian Bruns <camber umcc ais org>
> To: GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
> Subject: Re: gda-sybase: Ongoing developement in cvs
> In-Reply-To: <200010291213 EAA04124 gears linuxave net>
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
>
> On 29 Oct 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> > > Holger Thon wrote:
> > > > 3.) Also be added will be a gda-tds-server, which will try to use the tds
> > > > protocol stack of freetds directly.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions, or opinions?
> Not something I would recommend. libtds is a very low-level library
> intended only to reduce some of the duplication that the call level
> interfaces (dblib, ctlib, ODBC) would otherwise have to implement.
> The provider shouldn't need to know all the gory details of the wire-level
> protocol.
>
> The other advantage is that the same provider could be used with both
> freetds and openclient. Of course if it were in dblib and someone were
> motivated enough to port gnome-db to windows it could also run against MS dblib.
Nono, a bash and gcc for ms is enough... ;-)
Do you have any experiences if the ctlib/dblib based implementations of
freetds work with both sybase and ms sql? I see rodrigo's point to minimize
the count of providers, when they use the same protocol, so i want to
realize it in the tds provider.
Ciao,
Holger
> I'm intending to see what is missing from freetds to support the provider as
> soon as I chase down a couple of bugs and get freetds v0.51 out the door
> (I'm way overdue for a release).
Will there be also changes to the api, or just bugfixes? :-)
Ciao,
Holger
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]