Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at>
- Cc: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>, Chris Kuklewicz <chrisk mit edu>, gnome-components-list gnome org, GTK-- Mailing List <gtkmm-main lists sourceforge net>, jean de ratuld quadratec fr, GNOME hackers <gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx>, SigC++ Mailing List <libsigc-mlist lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- Date: 14 Sep 2000 17:06:34 -0400
Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at> writes:
> I see - I better had taken a closer look ;-). Can't we push the gtk+
> people to seperate their sig/slot/object thingy out into a seperate
> library, maybe even into glib? (this could be done keeping both source
> and binary compatibility IMHO)?
>
This is already done in the next version (GLib 2.0).
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
