Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at>
- Cc: Chris Kuklewicz <chrisk mit edu>, gnome-components-list gnome org, GTK-- Mailing List <gtkmm-main lists sourceforge net>, jean de ratuld quadratec fr, GNOME hackers <gnome-hackers nuclecu unam mx>, SigC++ Mailing List <libsigc-mlist lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:10:48 +0200 (CEST)
On 14 Sep 2000, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
>
> > Bonobo-- will use Gtk--, so it will depend on libsigc++ anyway.
> >
> Yes, but isn't Bonobo something widget-set independent (with default
> to GNOME widgets, of course)? I strongly vote for seperating the
> GUI-dependent stuff into its own shlib, or whatever.
This is something the Bonobo-- developers will have to decide on. If we
want to wrap Bonobo implementations consistent with gnomemm (which is the
whole point), we will have to depend on gtkmm. You could separate a bonobo
implementation into non-X-specific and X-specific parts (the later
implementing stuff like Bonobo::Control or Bonobo::UIHandler), but for
bonobomm this wouldn't make sense since when you use Gtk::Object, you
already depend on gtkmm, which in turn depends on gtk+.
--
.--= ULLA! =----------------------------. finger cactus cactus rulez org
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ for PGP public key
`----------= cactus cactus rulez org =--'
Ha az úszás olyan jót tesz az alaknak, mi a helyzet a bálnákkal?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]