Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)

[Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at>]

ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:

> On 14 Sep 2000, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> 
> > I see - I better had taken a closer look ;-). Can't we push the gtk+
> > people to seperate their sig/slot/object thingy out into a seperate
> > library, maybe even into glib? (this could be done keeping both source
> > and binary compatibility IMHO)?
> 
> Don't worry, GLIB 2.0 will include GObject, thus eliminating the
> dependency on GTK+ only for using the type system.
> 
> > Even if they don't: Whoever is making that decision: I beg: no mor
> > GUI/X deps than _absolutly_ necessary.
> 
> Please note that gtkmm wraps gtk 1.2 (the latest released version), which
> in turn uses glib 1.2, so it is not possible currently to remove the GTK+
> dependency.
>
I understood that, but thx. anyway.

> BTW, I'm happy that I really got some feedback this time. I will create a
> SourceForge page tomorrow and invite everyone interested so we can begin
> discussing bonobo-- specifics.
>
sounds good.

cu, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann     | Dru ICQ      | 54523380 ICQ | a rottmann gmx at
Pfeilgasse 4-6/725   | A-1080 Wien  | Austria      | Europe
http://www.8ung.at/rotty            | GnuPG Key: www.8ung.at/rotty/dru.asc
Fingerprint          | 3E9A C485 49A4 1D17 2EA7  2BA7 22AE C9BF 8173 6279