Re: a small summary.
- From: Michael Hoennig "(mi)" <mi sun com>
- To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar maurer-it com>
- Cc: Michael Hoennig "(mi)" <mi sun com>, "gnome-components-list gnome org" <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: a small summary.
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:41:44 GMT
Hi Dietmar,
> Sure, maybe there are some people using the OpenOffice API - but I cant
> understand why we should change our way to develop software. I simply
> don't want to do anything only because of some compatibility issues, or
> because some other none technical reasons. This is the big disadvantage
> of commercial software and I don't know why we should import that
> problems for free software.
<fiction>
Think about the year 2002 - about 2 years after the merger of BONOBO and
OpenOffice APIs.
OpenOffice, now with with 10 million lines of code, relies on BONOBO,
another 10 million lines of code will be on top of it - all using BONOBO
APIs.
</fiction>
And now I quote you again:
> I simply don't want to do anything
> only because of some compatibility issues
If your attitude were the one of the GNOME community, I would be damned
stupid, if I would continue trying to make my vision of a unified API
become true. I would sentence OpenOffice to death. I hope, most GNOME
hackers care more about compatibility issues - I know, some do. Hard
words, but true.
If never ever a computer hardware manufacturers dropped their proprietary
slot systems, a simple ethernet adapter would still cost a $1000 ...
Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]