hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.01.2007, 00:18 +0100 schrieb Christian Kirbach: > > "NEEDINFO: > > Reports should be set to NEEDINFO when there is essential information > > missing or a developer has some unanswered questions." > > > > this is still as vague at it is currently. :-/ > > It is not supposed to be a new stock answer. my cardinal point here was: "what is »essential«?" if we do not define this clearly, we will have exactly the same different opinions as before. > regarding the 'gentlewomen' agreement, I pledge for a recommendation to > leave the closure > to the original triager, unless the report has obviously been forgotten. again - "what is »obviously«?" a number of days? 75, 90? or what did you have in mind here? enlighten me! :-) cheers, andre -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed! http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/portal/aklapper
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil