RE: obscure bugs
- From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: 'John Fleck' <jfleck inkstain net>, gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: RE: obscure bugs
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:24:16 -0700
Try this one out, feel free to edit, it's public domain.
I don't see any information here on how to reproduce this bug, nor a
particular program that's crashing, so I'm closing it as incomplete. If you
have a particular bug that you can reproduce, please file a new bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ Thanks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Fleck [mailto:jfleck inkstain net]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:23 AM
> To: gnome-bugsquad gnome org
> Subject: obscure bugs
>
> In trying to work through old bugs and get them categorized, I'm
> running into many that fit a common pattern, and I'm wondering what to
> do with them.
>
> They're typically old - GNOME 1.2 or before - and consist of a
> description to the effect of "I don't know", or "it crashed," followed
> by a backtrace - no description of what crashed or what was happening
> prior to the crash.
>
> The backtrace has nothing in it that is identifiable to a specific
> program, only stuff happening in glib or gnome-libs.
>
> Is it reasonable to just mark these "INCOMPLETE" and be done with
> them, or is there some value in saving them and putting them
> somewhere, and if so, where?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]