Re: Orca on laptops.
- From: Joanmarie Diggs <j-diggs comcast net>
- To: Bill Haneman Sun COM
- Cc: Ubuntu Accessibility Mailing List <ubuntu-accessibility lists ubuntu com>, Gnome Accessibility List <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>, Orca screen reader developers <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Orca on laptops.
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:27:54 -0500
Hi Bill.
> I am not sure I understand your point - or perhaps you are
> misunderstanding me.
I suspect it's the former, but we'll see. :-)
> What I am suggesting is that we specifically _avoid_ using ShiftLock
And what I am suggesting is that we specifically _allow_ using it (if
possible).
> (which is generally a troublesome 'modifier'
> anyhow, because it always has "latch" behavior, i.e. toggles between
> on/off with successive keypresses).
I did wonder about this. I do know that in some Windows AT products,
ShiftLock is used as a modifier key. How they went about accomplishing
this, however, I couldn't tell you.
> Sorry if this sounds complicated, I am not sure how to put it more
> straightforwardly.
I think you're putting it quite straightforwardly, and I apologize for
not doing the same. If you'll permit me to try again:
What I would like to avoid, if possible, is the need for "loopholes" and
"work arounds." I *very rarely* use ShiftLock when I type, and I *very
frequently* rely upon shortcuts, access keys, etc. Therefore *for me*,
having ShiftLock as a possible modifier makes sense. Having it become
the additional key that I need to press in order to be able to use
existing shortcuts, access keys, etc. sounds like an excellent reason to
purchase an external keypad. :-)
Thanks much for your explanation! Take care.
--Joanie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]