Re: [g-a-devel] [Fwd: AccessX - ignoring the state of NumLock key]
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: Peter Korn <Peter Korn Sun COM>
- Cc: Gnome A11y Development <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, sobhi us ibm com
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] [Fwd: AccessX - ignoring the state of NumLock key]
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:56:49 +0100
Hi Guys:
Whatever the situation here, it's likely to be the Xkb extension itself
that's responsible for the behavior. The desktop/gnome MouseKeys code
doesn't touch anything to do with the NumLock state, to the best of my
knowledge.
It's _possible_ that the NumLock behavior is configurable somehow (i.e.
ignore NumLock or don't ignore), but I am not sure. It should be in the
XKB manual: (chapter 10 deals with AccessX). My reading of section 10.5
implies that the MouseKeys actions are bound to certain keys via the
keymap, so it may be that one or more of the keymaps in question is
binding the mousekeys actions to too many states (in other words, the
problem may be either in XKB or in the key maps themselves, but it is
probably not in the desktop software):
http://www.xfree86.org/current/XKBlib.pdf
regards
Bill
Peter Korn wrote:
Reposting from desktop-devel, as the folks here are much more likely
to know the answer...
Regards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
AccessX - ignoring the state of NumLock key
From:
Ali Sobhi <sobhi us ibm com>
Date:
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:33:23 -0500
To:
desktop-devel-list gnome org
To:
desktop-devel-list gnome org
I have noticed that which working with "MouseKeys" = on, the state of
"NumLock" is ignored.
the Keypad keys operate on pointer movement and perform the click, drag
and double-click regardless of the
state of NumLock. This is contrary to Windows.
I was under impression that MouseKeys option should allow the selection of
NumLock state in which the Mousekeys
are used for Pointer / Mouse control and in the opposite state, the keypad
can be used for its numerical entry task.
Is this is an overlooked feature?
Regards,
Ali Sobhi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sr. Consultant - IBM Research
Human Ability and Accessibility Center
512-823-0064 (T/L 793) sobhi us ibm com
http://www.ibm.com/able/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]