[g-a-devel]Gnopernicus ChangeLog

[Marc Mulcahy <marc mulcahy sun com>]

Hi Adi,

Thanks, this is great.

I think keeping the code up to date is important-- as long as it builds 
with your version of the at-spi, then it seems reasonable to check it 
in.  Then we who are running the latest and greatest can help you make any 
necessary changes to get it to compile with newer versions.

I think the ideal would be for you to be running relatively recent versions 
of at-spi...

Marc

At 08:21 PM 1/28/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> On Saturday 26 January 2002 00:17, Marc Mulcahy wrote:
> Hi Marc, All
>
>         We was unable to work with current version of at-spi and gnome-2 
> libraries,
> so even if we made a commit you could not test our code because, I assume,
> you worked with the current libraries ( and we were using older ).
>         Fortunately we received a new archive of gnome-2 (the last one 
> was from 12
> december) and we could update our code. So I hope everything will be normal
> from now on. ( the code is available now in the CVS ).
>
> Best regards,
> Adi Dascal
> Baum Engineering, Romania
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've reversed the order of entries in the Gnopernicus ChangeLog to match
> > GNOME conventions, and to make it easier to immediately see what changes
> > have been made.  I notice also that nothing has been comitted to CVS in
> > over a month (the last changes were made on 2001-12-21).  I'd like to
> > contribute to the integration of gnome-speech into Gnopernicus, and I'll
> > need much more frequent CVS updates to do so.  Is there any reason that
> > Gnopernicus code can not immediately be placed into cvs?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel