Re: Getting libgnome* into shape

[Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>]

George wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:36:18AM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > George wrote:
> >
> > > >         As long as there is no include gconf.h in the installed headers, I
> > > > can cope with this with a whole load of mental screaming about horrendous
> > > > lack of taste, and general brokenness; preferably no GErrors would be nice
> > > > as well.
> > >
> > > There are two pieces of API which are just as applicable to if you use GConf
> > > or if you're using bonobo_config with the gconf monicker.  (or not, they're
> > > just for getting paths).  They could be for all I care dropped as well.
> > > Else, it's actually bonobo-conf that's adding API to libgnome*, not the other
> > > way around.
> >
> > Why does bonobo-config add a new API? Which one? bonobo-config simply uses an
> > (already) existing Bonobo interface.
>
> I'm not saying it has to, but it does in the way things are implemented in
> libgnome.
>

Maybe we are talking about different things, but IMO bonobo-config removes an API
(the gnome-config API), and it does not add any new API.

- Dietmar