Re: Getting libgnome* into shape
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Getting libgnome* into shape
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:41:13 -0700
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:58:29AM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > I'm not saying it has to, but it does in the way things are implemented in
> > libgnome.
> Maybe we are talking about different things, but IMO bonobo-config removes an API
> (the gnome-config API), and it does not add any new API.
And the API I posted was what exactly? Not an API? It looked like an API to
me. With the gnome-init.h API we're exposing bonobo-config API to
everything. With the way the GConf support is implemented we're exposing NO
further API. So yes, bonobo-config ADDs an API to libgnome. gnome-config
being gone or not. GConf doesn't. So if we're looking for less API for
in the end the same result, then to me, using GConf seems a better idea.
Perhaps bonobo-config doesn't need that extra libgnome API, I'm not sure.
But there is EXTRA API in libgnome that's not needed if you don't use
George <jirka 5z com>
I either want less corruption, or more chance to participate in it.
-- Ashleigh Brilliant
] [Thread Prev