[glade--]Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Jon Cast <jcast ou edu>
- Cc: murrayc usa net, Joaquin Cuenca Abela <e98cuenc free fr>, Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, glade-devel ximian com, glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: [glade--]Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- Date: 09 Mar 2003 13:02:46 +0000
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 02:44, Jon Cast wrote:
> Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> wrote:
> > The only glade-generated code that an end-user should/would want to
> > modify IFAICS are the stubs (end-users might want to insert
> > implementations there). But the generation of callback stub code is a
> > convenience feature.
>
> Right. In fact, there's no reason I can see to even generate them; the
> only code I'd want to keep is code I can copy from the header file
> anyway, and I don't think there's any reason to modify that. So the
> argument is against auto-generating the handler stubs, not against
> auto-generating the UI creation code.
I do believe that handler stub generation is useful. I advocate
improving it, not removing it.
Dissatisfactor with the UI generation code is what started the
discussion.
- Bill
>
> <snip>
>
> Jon Cast
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
--
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]