Re: [Gimp-web] [New here] I would like to offer my help!

[Pat David <patdavid gmail com>]

I'm seeing around 6.37s here personally (while Hugo is building dtorg in
around 388ms).
(Sorry, didn't want to chase down dependencies to get the pelican version
of darktable running - would have been a better comparison).

Guess a new machine makes a nice difference too. :)

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:46 AM Shlomi Fish <shlomif shlomifish org> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:18:52 +0300
> Shlomi Fish <shlomif shlomifish org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pat,
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:52:25 -0500
> > Pat David via gimp-web-list <gimp-web-list gnome org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Shlomi and Marco!
> > >
> > > > 1. How is Hugo superior to Pelican wrt the gimp.org site?
> > >
> > > There are a few ways (this is based roughly on a fun dive through
> various
> > > static site generators over the last 6-7 years):
> > >
> > > 1. It's a self-contained binary for the generator. No other
> requirements or
> > > dependencies.
> > > 2. It's under very active development by the community and pushes
> updates
> > > and security fixes almost every month (or a couple of times a month).
> > > 3. It's FAST to build a site. Right now if you change something in
> gimp.org
> > > with Pelican it takes around 3-4 minutes to build the site. Hugo has
> been
> > > building in a few seconds (for some of the other sites I've done that
> are
> > > not too far off in similar size).
> >
> > Even if you change the inner content of a single page? I think using
> Pelican
> > to build gimp.org (from scratch) was faster than 3 minutes here - I can
> check
> > again.
>
> Checked now: 17s for a first build; 12s for a rebuild:
>
> ```
> Done: Processed 144 articles, 1 draft, 0 hidden articles, 111 pages, 38
> hidden pages and 0 draft pages in 17.25 seconds.
> pelican -s pelicanconf.py  12.64s user 0.49s system 73% cpu 17.909 total
> (py3-venv) [shlomif@telaviv1 gimp-web]$ time pelican -s pelicanconf.py >&
> ~/rebuild.txt
> pelican -s pelicanconf.py >&~/rebuild.txt  12.35s user 0.47s system 99% cpu
> 12.902 total
> (py3-venv) [shlomif@telaviv1 gimp-web]$ gvim ~/y2
> (py3-venv) [shlomif@telaviv1 gimp-web]$ inxi
> CPU: Dual Core Intel Core i3-2100 (-MT MCP-)
> speed/min/max: 1596/1600/3100 MHz Kernel: 5.14.9-200.fc34.x86_64 x86_64
> Up: 2d 9h 5m Mem: 3137.4/7847.9 MiB (40.0%)
> Storage: 1.82 TiB (36.1% used) Procs: 232 Shell: Zsh inxi: 3.3.06
> (py3-venv) [shlomif@telaviv1 gimp-web]$ inxi -CSG
> System:
>   Host: telaviv1.shlomifish.org Kernel: 5.14.9-200.fc34.x86_64 x86_64
>   bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.16.0 Distro: Fedora release 34 (Thirty Four)
> CPU:
>   Info: Dual Core model: Intel Core i3-2100 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
>   L2: 3 MiB
>   Speed: 1596 MHz min/max: 1600/3100 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1596
>   2: 1627 3: 1625 4: 1596
> Graphics:
>   Device-1: Intel 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics
> driver: i915 v: kernel
>   Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: loaded: modesetting
>   unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
>   OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 2000 (SNB GT1)
>   v: 3.3 Mesa 21.1.8
> (py3-venv) [shlomif@telaviv1 gimp-web]$
>
> ```
>
> > > 4. The source/output file organization is a better mental model of how
> a
> > > site would normally be built (pages for directories, lists, etc etc -
> I had
> > > to hack at Pelican to get the generator to build output similar to
> what was
> > > sitting on disk.).
> > > 5. Easy i18n support out of the box (this might require some
> modifications
> > > to interface with po files to support marco, I'll look into it).
> > > 6. Did I mention it's fast?
> > > 7. We (pixls.us folks) have migrated all of the sites we're managing
> over
> > > to Hugo already (just finished up the darktable.org migration) so it
> makes
> > > it easier for me to ask other users to help out as they're already
> familar
> > > with the tooling (asking them to look at pelican usually results in
> silence
> > > in IRC... :D :D :D ).
> > >
> > > I have not gotten a consensus per se, other than to see if current
> people
> > > hacking at it would be ok with it (nmat, maybe Jehan but I haven't
> bothered
> > > him with this yet).
> > >
> > > Ultimately my hope would be that we can lower the barrier to entry for
> > > creating content/posts on the site and possibly engage the broader
> > > community more (one can hope...).
> >
> > All these sound like good reasons.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Shlomi Fish       https://www.shlomifish.org/
> Interview with Ben Collins-Sussman - https://shlom.in/sussman
>
> Oh! I wish you could see the look on his face! Actually, I would have also
> liked to see the look on his face, but just then I woke up from the dream.
>     — https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/TheEnemy/
>
> Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - https://shlom.in/reply
> .
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-web-list mailing list
> gimp-web-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list


-- 
https://patdavid.net
GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D  18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC