Re: [Gimp-web] Is the project still running?
- From: Marco Ciampa <ciampix libero it>
- To: gimp-web-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-web] Is the project still running?
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:39:06 +0200
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:30:08PM +0000, Pat David wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:19 PM Michael Schumacher <schumaml gmx de> wrote:
On 08/19/2015 04:55 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Sorry I missed this. Who when and why decided for markdown?
#gimp on irc.gimp.org
I think all active contributors to anything GIMP should make an effort
to be there, otherwise it is really easy to miss out on stuff.
I mentioned the WGO_Redesign page on the wiki (
http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php?title=WGO_Redesign), in this msg:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-web-list%40gnome.org/msg00191.html
I hadn't heard any feedback, so began working with what I had. It is not
tied to markdown. We can still use restructured text or even html, but I
outlined reasons why I felt a simple markup format can only help (as
opposed to expecting contribs to write in pure (x)html markup).
Yes I agree to avoid html, but think that markdown should be avoided.
I conducted a little research for improving the KiCad documentation,
see this:
https://github.com/ciampix/kicad-doc/tree/master/doc_alternatives
the result is that we decided to use asciidoc for the web also.
This is my 2 cents
--
Marco Ciampa
I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.
+------------------------+
| GNU/Linux User #78271 |
| FSFE fellow #364 |
+------------------------+
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]