Re: [Gimp-user] Time to fork BABL and GEGL

[Øyvind Kolås <pippin gimp org>]

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Elle Stone
<ellestone ninedegreesbelow com> wrote:
> if the other babl/GEGL/GIMP developers really are in agreement with Jon
> Nordby (the babl roadmap leaves room for differing interpretations), then
> there is no reason whatsoever for further discussion of forking babl and
> GEGL to benefit GIMP.

Misinterpreting is your choice. You still seem to have little trust
that babl/GEGL/GIMP developers have the interests of users/colors or
the future of their software in mind.

babl/GEGL/GIMP developers have had rough consensus on this topic since
march or april, and the roadmap is as detailed as it is not for the
benefit of babl/GEGL developers but to contrast the endless and
pointless email threads. If the hundreds of hours donated/devoted to
the topic had been spent on actual development instead of disagreement
about how the software should be developed, we would have a more
capable stack already.

/pippin