Re: [Gimp-user] A Sad case of regression



On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 00:52 +0200, Ofnuts wrote:
 if you only do local editing and save the image back with the 
exact same JPEG quality settings, the "blocks" which no changed pixels 
very quickly end up producing the very same data as their source in the 
JPEG file in every editing cycle,

This depends on the sorts of edits you do.

For example, changing contrast or levels globally, or running a sharpen
filter, will often accentuate the original jpeg artifacts so that they
in turn create new artifacts.

(that's why I mentioned levels, curves and sharpen explicitly in the
post i made somewhere else in this thread).

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]