Re: [Gimp-user] About bad new save export function in Gimp-2.8

[maderios <maderios gmail com>]

On 09/10/2012 06:57 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
> Ken Warner (kwarner000 verizon net) wrote:
> > On 9/10/2012 9:32 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > maderios (maderios gmail com) wrote:
> > > > Because you're not dealing with reality. This is the problem of
> > > > amateurs who create software professional vocation.
> > >
> > > See? This is what I was referring to.

Hi
> > Just because the English doesn't meet your standards doesn't mean the
> > viewpoint is invalid.  And maybe your refusal to see the thought in
> > the message is the root of the discord.
>
> Sorry for being too terse. But I was not referring to the language
> (although I don't understand the "vocation" word there).

Sorry for my bad english...
For me "professional vocation" meant "professional use".
 I was referring
> to the insinuation that we - as the developers - are just amateurs not
> dealing with reality and hence do things the wrong way.

To be an amateur is a good thing. Great artists, painters, musicians 
were amateurs but I still think that the the need is not the same when 
you work all day as "professional" or working occasionally as "amateur". 
When you work all day, you are much more sensitive to some details that 
complicate your life. This "bad new save export function" is an 
important detail.
> Yes, I do take offense in that.
I apologize

Regards
--
Maderios