Re: [Gimp-developer] Enhancement request for .cur cursor files
- From: "Joao S. O. Bueno" <gwidion mpc com br>
- To: Richard <strata_ranger hotmail com>
- Cc: gimp-developer <gimp-developer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Enhancement request for .cur cursor files
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:03:44 -0200
So, here is the list :-)
There is the request, it seens to match the product vision , and I
think it is a valid request.
Anyone ahs some more information on the .cur files (or the .ani) for
taht case that we could throw in the feature request?
On 20 January 2014 14:38, Richard <strata_ranger hotmail com> wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:15:17 -0200
From: gwidion mpc com br
To: scl gplus gmail com
CC: gimp-developer-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Enhancement request for .cur cursor files
I don't know if closing the bugt report as "invalid" is a nice choice,
if it is a valid feature being requested.
Are there more bug reports asking for the same thing? (/me shyes away
of dealing with bugzilla) - so this would be a duplicate?
I've been through this. A lot of the time the closing post is a request to
discuss it on the mailing list -before- filing it as a bug report.
-- Stratadrake
strata_ranger hotmail com
--------------------
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]