Re: [Gimp-developer] how far from 2.10?

[Jon Nordby <jononor gmail com>]

On 2 January 2014 16:05, Michael Natterer <mitch gimp org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 00:48 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
> > In the usual V.R.M numbering, the situation above is typically when you
> > change the version number (and maybe the file extension)... because my
> > point here is not the (completely understandable) incompatibilities, it
> > their understatement by calling the next version 2.10.
>
> It's called 2.10 because it's binary and source compatible to 2.x.
> We did not remove any functions, we only deprecated. That's the
> only thing that counts, not how much has changed behind the
> public API.

This means that plugins/scripts that worked in 2.8 should work in 2.10
and if things break it is considered a bug. So please report such
issues in bugzilla!

-- 
Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com