Re: [Gimp-developer] refactor palette loading code
- From: Warren Turkal <wt penguintechs org>
- To: Michael Henning <drawoc darkrefraction com>
- Cc: Graphical Geniuses <gimp-developer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] refactor palette loading code
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 02:37:28 -0700
Thanks for letting me know.
wt
On Sep 17, 2013 4:44 PM, "Michael Henning" <drawoc darkrefraction com>
wrote:
wt: Your new patch looks good, so I committed it. Thanks!
As a side note, I modified the message slightly. We normally include
the general area of the commit (often the top level directory) as a
prefix to the commit message. Also, I removed the "signed off by" line
because we don't really use that.
The short paragraph probably wasn't necessary in this case (we know
what refactoring means), but I left that in anyway. :)
commit 198f2514ab03cd77c769b0cea9678fa0deba4f6e
Author: Warren Turkal <wt penguintechs org>
Date: Sat Sep 14 23:46:28 2013 -0700
app: Refactor palette loaders.
I specifically moved the file opening/closing logic to the common
code. This makes the code easier to understand for me since there
is less duplication. In fact, this commit removes more lines than
it adds.
After I committed it, Mitch asked me to change the function names from
your patch on irc. You can see that commit here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/commit/?id=d02dd9f0da778640a0a8a82420ee22f9a6efc943
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Michael Schumacher <schumaml gmx de>
wrote:
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2013 um 09:34 Uhr
Von: "Warren Turkal" <wt penguintechs org>
I am willing to do whatever is needed to contribute. However, it would
be
nice if the mailing list wouldn't block patches.
Please keep in mind that those file would be sent out to every
subscriber of this mailing list, even those who would not want to receive
them. Now imagine people being subscribed to > 10 mailing lists. Would you
want to receive all patches and bundles from all the projects you're
subscribed to?
The preferred way right now is to open bug reports in Bugzilla and
attach your patches there.
Has anyone taken a look at maybe using gerrit? It's actually a pretty
reasonable way to handle code changes when using git. It has a pretty
nice
code review workflow. Projects like Android and Libreoffice use it. As
an
example, here's a link
<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:open,n,z>to the Libreoffice
instance.
Might be worthwhile to discuss that with GNOME; it's their repository
we're using after all.
They could be interesed in this especially for their GNOME Love bugs,
see https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeLove
--
Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list gnome org
List membership:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: gimp-developer-list gnome org
List membership:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]