Re: [gdome]LGPL?



On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 06:01:21AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:21:56PM -0700, Ian Main wrote:
> > Yeah, no problem at all.  I've even been releasing things under the X/MIT license
> > lately as it's even less restrictive than LGPL.. so I'm all for it.
> 
>   Actually both libxml and libxslt are realeased under 2 licences (one or
> the other):
>    - LGPL
>    - MIT like (W3C or an adapatation)
> as some people expressed concerns about the LGPL,

Cool.  I certainly think that for something like the w3c where you are trying to
make standardized implementations, a license that allows it to be used in more
software (even commercial) is a good thing.

Just look at what the BSD license did for the TCP/IP stack.

Ian
 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]