Re: [gdome]LGPL?
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Ian Main <imain netidea com>
- Cc: Anders Carlsson <andersca gnu org>, veillard redhat com, Paolo Casarini <casarini CS UniBO IT>, Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>, gdome gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gdome]LGPL?
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 06:01:21 -0400
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:21:56PM -0700, Ian Main wrote:
> Yeah, no problem at all. I've even been releasing things under the X/MIT license
> lately as it's even less restrictive than LGPL.. so I'm all for it.
Actually both libxml and libxslt are realeased under 2 licences (one or
the other):
- LGPL
- MIT like (W3C or an adapatation)
as some people expressed concerns about the LGPL,
yours,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Sep 17-18 2001 Brussels Red Hat TechWorld http://www.redhat-techworld.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
