Re: [gdome]LGPL?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Casarini wrote:
> 
> On 12 Jun 2001, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > GDome seems to be licensed under the GPL. Why not license it under the LGPL,
> > which is used by the rest of the GNOME libraries. Surely, a GPL library can
> > not be used by a LGPL library, such as those GNOME libraries.
> When I start working on Gdome2 it was under GPL and it is still under
> it. I want that Gdome2 is a LGPL library but I think I can't modify
> the today situation without the consent of all previously authors of this
> library.
> 
> To Raph, Daniel, Mathieu, Anders: Are you agree to change the license of
> Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL?

  I have no problem with this.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/