Re: [gdm-list] at-spi-registryd not starting automatically in gdm [was multiple at-spi...]
- From: Francesco Fumanti <francesco fumanti gmx net>
- To: Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM>
- Cc: gdm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gdm-list] at-spi-registryd not starting automatically in gdm [was multiple at-spi...]
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:26:59 +0200
Hello,
Brian Cameron wrote:
I just fixed this bug for the GDM 2.20.0 release. Now you can specify
the location of the at-spi-registryd via the --with-at-spidir configure
argument. Your distro will still need to use this flag when configuring
GDM to fix the problem. I assume you can follow up with them on this?
Yesterday, the Ubuntu 7.10 Distribution offered an updated versions
of GDM. The packager took (among others) the new configuration option
into account and at-spi-registryd gets automatically started as it
should.
Thanks again for the fix.
Now, I stumbled on an odd behaviour of at-spi-registryd during GDM.
Maybe it is normal and I do not understand what is going on. Here is
what happens:
When I remotely (ssh) change a value with an editor in the gesture
configuration file of gdm, I enter "sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart" to
make it recognise the change; and an instance (*) of at-spi-registryd
is automatically started under the gdm user. (this is probably not
the best way to make it recognise the change, but it is not the topic
now)
Then, when I connect remotely to gdmlogin, the applications that I
try to launch with a gesture tell me that at-spi-registryd is not
running.
So I disconnect from the gdm session and afterwards I manually kill
the at-spi-registryd instance (*) that was created by the restart of
gdm.
I go on and connect remotely to gdm, and a new instance of
at-spi-registryd is started which is then recognised by the
applications started by a gesture.
Please, do not get me wrong: at-spi-registryd is recognised without
problems if it was started by the current gdm session; however if it
was running before opening the gdm session, it is not found, although
it is running under the gdm user.
Is there any explanation for this behaviour, or is there something
wrong going on?
Thanks in advance.
Francesco
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]