On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 12:47 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I find that final note utterly inappropriate. I can't find a single person that has worked with Philip that thinks he is untrustworthy, your implication here is VERY toxic and creates an environment of unnecessary tension, if you don't agree with how the board operates that is fine, but turning those concerns with the operations into personal accusations towards people who are doing this under a volunteer capacity and most likely with the best intentions is not acceptable and it damages the good spirit of this community. Please stop turning these issues into personal attacks.
I never wanted to bring this whole issue to the public by posting about it on foundation-list. Unfortunately, Philip brought this up during the election and I do believe that it was important that there is some follow up as public attention had been drawn to the issue already. Benjamin
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/action/diff/FoundationBoard/Minutes/20180529?action=diff&rev1=1&rev2=2 [2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2018-October/msg00001.html [3] https://wiki.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/Minutes/20181009 [4] https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Board/issues/60#note_344793 _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list gnome org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part