On Do, 2015-11-05 at 10:18 -0800, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 15-11-05 10:08 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote:Actually, the way I read section 8.2.4 combined with 8.4.1 right now it seems perfectly sane to argue that Christian could have finished his term in office despite the change of affiliation.Would the board and Christian consider doing this, and also establish precedent that in the future, only affiliation at the time of candidacy is relevant to the 40% rule?
At this point Christian has resigned already and electing him to be on the board *would* be a violation of section 8.2.4. But yes, one could decide to handle it that way in the future. Benjamin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part