Hi Andre! > Plus sometimes I would have prefered to see more transparency in GNOME > with regard to decision making on our sometimes bumpy way to GNOME 3.0 > so one task will be to find ways to facilitate. Do you think it would be useful for GNOME to have a policy that things that haven't been discussed on a public (archived) mailing list but instead only privately (IRC, etc) haven't been discussed at all? Regards, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part