Re: Meeting Minutes Published - February 1st, 2011





On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Og Maciel <ogmaciel gnome org> wrote:

Understood. I hope you'll accept my word that I am fully committed to
the work I do for the GNOME Foundation and that the fact I was
confused about being present at said meeting was by no means lack of
my interest or commitment. I have been to one too many meetings and
was truly confused. I sure hope this lapse won't tarnish all the hard
work I have done so far.

I do appreciate all the work you've done, especially the Friends of GNOME work.

I apologize if I over reacted but the mail saying you don't remember so you were going to say you were there, seemed flippant to me. If I didn't remember if I was there or not, I'd mark myself absent. The point isn't to show how much work you've done but to represent GNOME. And I'd be worried I was endorsing conversations I hadn't been a part of it.

And in part, I was concerned that you were making it look like it wasn't important to everyone.

I do appreciate all the work the directors do. It's an important role and I respect all of you for putting the time and effort into making the GNOME Foundation and GNOME successful. I know it's a lot of work that isn't always recognized.

Thank you for helping make GNOME accomplish its mission.

Stormy


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]